People who want to go and make all the great authors homosexual, in many cases (not all) have simply forgotten the traditional understanding of love. C. S. Lewis reminded us (one of the many things he reminded us) of the "four loves" of affection, friendship, eros, and agape. It is shameless the way literary critics look for "homoerotic" elements in some great poets where the only real evidence is for friendship, affection, and agape. Our epoch has reduced "love" to erotic love. Do they relegate the male embrace of Achilles and Odysseus, Beowulf and Wiglaf, Lancelot and Arthur, to "homoeroticism"? Freud and his slaves have really bitched everything up. Even to the point where certain actions that in past ages were considered overtly masculine now represent some kind of goddam repressed femininity on one of any given two men. It really is ridiculous. Of course, the agenda is political, unfortunately. It is all political. The reasoning that no one wants to let you in on is that if great authors and great works of literature are "O.K." with homosexuality, and we regard said works as "great," then, why by God! it is certainly great and humane to be a fairy after all!
What a load of... -- oh hell, I forgot the French word for bullshit.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Your so F#@ken RIGHT!, GIVE US A BREAK ON THIS! WHEN A WOMAN HAS TO MARRY A F'N JERK, CUZ THAT'S ALL THAT'S LEFT,THE REST ARE "GAY" (i KNOW I'M OFF SUBJECT)BUT I'M SO TIRED OF THIS, LET'S CALL A SPADE, A SPADE FOR BLOODY SAKE!
ReplyDelete